IATF 16949 · ISO 9001

Quality

From the finding on the line to the evidence you hand the auditor, all in one system.

▦SLOV Operations⌕   |   LM   Laura Méndez⌄
CalidadTableroAlertas8DRecorridosPPAPTrazabilidadAuditoríaDocumentos
Caso de calidad

NC-2024-0837 ●   Alerta abierta

Fuga de aceite en tapa de motor

Línea 3 · Estación 5
Folio
NC-2024-0837
Fecha de apertura
28 ago 2024   10:24
Área
Producción
Proceso
Maquinado
Referencia
Tapa de motor TM-473
  1. HallazgoRegistro en la línea
  2. AlertaEvaluación y contención
  3. 8DAnálisis de causa raíz
  4. EvidenciaEvidencia documental
  5. EficaciaCierre y verificación
Detalle de la alerta
Estado
Alerta abierta
Responsable
Ana Gómez
Fecha compromiso
04 sep 2024
Prioridad
Alta
Descripción
Se detecta fuga de aceite en inspección final. Se contiene lote y se inicia análisis 8D.
Evidencia adjunta (2)
IMG_3287.jpgInspección en línea
28 ago 2024 · 2.4 MB
Checklist_contención.pdfEvidencia de contención
28 ago 2024 · 1.1 MB
Ver toda la evidencia  →
Aprobación
◷   Pendiente de aprobaciónEl caso está en revisión por Calidad para avanzar a 8D.
Revisor
Luis Torres
Fecha límite
04 sep 2024
Datos de ejemplo.

From the floor to the audit

From finding to closure

Quality answers for every part that leaves the plant, to the customer, to the auditor and to the plant itself.

Today

Today the same defect gets written up three times, and audit week means digging the evidence back out.

Notebook, then retyped
Forwarded emails
Word file, signatures elsewhere
Evidence in folders

With SLOV Operations

Capture it once, on the floor. The alert, the 8D and the audit file are the same record at different moments.

Photo report
Alert with acknowledgment
8D with two approvals
Evidence by clause
01Record
TodayNotebook, then retyped
With SLOV OperationsPhoto report
02Follow-up
TodayForwarded emails
With SLOV OperationsAlert with acknowledgment
03Resolution
TodayWord file, signatures elsewhere
With SLOV Operations8D with two approvals
04Audit
TodayEvidence in folders
With SLOV OperationsEvidence by clause

Today the same defect gets written up three times, and audit week means digging the evidence back out.

Capture it once, on the floor. The alert, the 8D and the audit file are the same record at different moments.

What changes if you start with Quality

The whole case, while it is still happening

Quality gets the full picture as the case unfolds: what happened, who owns it, what still needs to close. Nobody rebuilds the file for the audit.

Ownership

One alert, one thread. Which areas are involved, who received it, who is working it, whose signature is still pending.

Traceability

Customer, part number, PPAP, finding, alert, 8D, evidence. One chain, and it stays linked.

Control

Nobody signs off on their own 8D. A second reviewer approves the closure, and the date and reason go on record.

Effectiveness

Closing the action is step one. The check that it actually worked gets scheduled, with an owner and a pass criterion.

The history is already there for SLOV AI

Everything Quality records becomes a history you can query. SLOV AI searches for precedents, points out what is missing and proposes the next step, with its source. A person from Quality decides.

See SLOV AI

When is your customer's next audit?

Start with Quality

Not yet? Keep reading here: Suppliers · People